Review Access
This page is not yet public. Enter the password to continue.
Incorrect password. Try again.
⚠ Virginia Voters — Ballot Question 1

This November,
Ballot Question 1 Would
Remove Restrictions That
Currently Limit Third‑Trimester
Abortion in Virginia

The ballot language says "reproductive freedom." What it does not say is who pays the price. Every abortion ends a human life — and the documented physical and psychological harm to women is extensive and largely unreported. Beyond that, Ballot Question 1 would:

Read the full analysis ↓
26wk
Abortion currently legal in Virginia up to 26 weeks, for any reason, under existing law
400+
Third-trimester abortions recorded in Virginia in 2024 (Guttmacher Institute)
0
Mentions of medical standards, parental consent, or conscience protections in the amendment text
Understanding What the Amendment Actually Says

So-Called
"Reproductive Freedom"
Sounds Reasonable.
The Proposed Amendment
Is Anything But Reasonable.

Ballot Question 1 uses the word "abortion" without ever acknowledging what abortion actually is: the termination of a genetically distinct human life. Embryology is unambiguous on this point — at fertilization, a unique human being exists. That is not theology. That is science.

No abortion is without a victim. The unborn child does not survive. And the toll on women is far more than physical — peer-reviewed research documents elevated rates of depression, anxiety, grief, and post-traumatic stress following abortion. The framing of "reproductive freedom" erases both of these realities entirely.

What Ballot Question 1 would do is cement this into Virginia's constitution permanently — stripping away the remaining safeguards that protect women from unregulated procedures, removing parental consent for minors, compelling medical professionals to participate against their conscience, and creating the legal framework for unlimited taxpayer funding. Virginia voters deserve the full picture before November.

A Closer Look at the Amendment

Six Things Ballot Question 1 Would Do to Virginia

These are the documented implications of the amendment's language.

01
Remove Safeguards on Early Abortions
The amendment limits regulation to the third trimester only — leaving first and second trimester abortions completely omitted. Any medical standards, clinic requirements, or safety rules for early abortions could be legally challenged and removed.
02
Expand Late‑Term Abortion Access
Virginia recorded 400+ third-trimester abortions in 2024. The amendment restricts regulation only to the third trimester — with broad exceptions that could substantially limit even those restrictions in practice.
03
Eliminate Parental Consent for Minors
Current Virginia law requires parental involvement when a minor seeks an abortion. Ballot Question 1 does not include parental consent language — meaning that protection could be constitutionally eliminated.
04
Create Taxpayer Funding Obligations
By establishing a "fundamental right" to reproductive freedom, the amendment creates a legal basis for requiring state funding for abortions and contraception — with no opt-out mechanism included in the text.
05
Put Medical Conscience Rights at Risk
The amendment's language that no individual may "burden or infringe" on the right could create legal exposure for healthcare workers who decline to perform abortions based on religious or moral convictions.
06
Restrict Faith Communities & Advocates
Because the amendment creates a fundamental constitutional right, those who counsel against abortion, operate pregnancy centers, or publicly advocate alternatives could face claims that they are infringing on that right.
Side-by-Side Comparison

Virginia Law Today vs. Ballot Question 1

What current Virginia law provides — and what the amendment's text omits.

Issue Virginia Law Today Under Ballot Question 1
Medical standards for clinics & providers Regulated — standards required Omitted from amendment text — open to legal challenge
1st & 2nd trimester abortion regulations Regulations exist in statute Completely omitted — no constitutional basis for regulation
Third-trimester abortions Restrictions in law Regulated with broad exceptions that could limit restrictions
Parental consent for minors Required by law Not included in amendment text — could be eliminated
Taxpayer funding for abortion Limited — specific circumstances only Fundamental right language creates funding obligation
Medical conscience protections Protected under current law At legal risk under "burden or infringe" language
Faith-based advocacy & pregnancy centers Free to operate and advocate Could face claims of infringing a constitutional right
Perspectives from Virginians

What Virginians Are Saying

Faith Leader
"All human life beginning at conception has great value because each person is a unique creation made in the image of God for a wonderful purpose in this world."
Pastor Watson Morgan, United Church, Stanardsville, VA
Virginia Delegate
"It is our responsibility to protect our babies from those who would harm them. If we can't get the basics right, then we won't succeed at anything else."
Delegate Tim Griffin, Virginia House of Delegates
CWA Advocate
"One only needs to read the amendment to see how broad and vague the language is. When protections are removed for safe abortions, what remains is health care-lessness."
Kathy Meckley, CWA Prayer Action Leader
Help Spread Accurate Information

Know the Facts.
Share the Facts.

Virginia voters have a right to understand what Ballot Question 1 actually contains before they cast their ballot. Share this information with family, friends, and your community.